The high degree of the intra-individual variability of blood pressure
(BP) is related both to biological and technological factors: the biol
ogical components of variability are either linked to sympathetic syst
em and respiratory movements or induced by physical and psycho-sensori
al stresses; the technological sources of variability are the apparatu
s and the doctor. The consequences of this high variability can be qua
ntified: the risk for a between-visit change of 35 mmHg for systolic B
P (and 17 mmHg for diastolic BP) to be due to the spontaneous BP varia
bility, is as high as 95%. Moreover, according to the regression to th
e mean, in selected patients with a mean SBP as high as 160 mmHg, a me
an spontaneous decrease of 9 mmHg is expected to occur, at the next vi
sit. The physician has then to manage the lack of accuracy of clinic B
P measurements. For this purpose, three strategies have to be used: th
oroughly examining the patient (if associated with an organ damage, th
e high BP undoubtedly requires to be treated); rigorously taking into
account the published recommendations of BP measurements (the sources
of error are now wellknown and may be easily corrected); finally, usin
g the most sophisticated methods of BP measurements (elf BP measuremen
t), semi-ambulatory or ambulatory BP monitoring, exercise testing), wh
ich in some circumstances, may provide useful additional information.