NERVUS-TERMINALIS GANGLION OF THE BONNETHEAD SHARK (SPHYMA-TIBURO) - EVIDENCE FOR CHOLINERGIC AND CATECHOLAMINERGIC INFLUENCE ON 2 CELL-TYPES DISTINGUISHED BY PEPTIDE IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY
J. White et M. Meredith, NERVUS-TERMINALIS GANGLION OF THE BONNETHEAD SHARK (SPHYMA-TIBURO) - EVIDENCE FOR CHOLINERGIC AND CATECHOLAMINERGIC INFLUENCE ON 2 CELL-TYPES DISTINGUISHED BY PEPTIDE IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY, Journal of comparative neurology, 351(3), 1995, pp. 385-403
The nervus terminalis is a ganglionated vertebrate cranial nerve of un
known function that connects the brain and the peripheral nasal struct
ures. To investigate its function, we have studied nervus terminalis g
anglion morphology and physiology in the bonnethead shark (Sphyrna tib
uro), where the nerve is particularly prominent. Immunocytochemistry f
or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and Leu-Pro-Leu-Arg-Phe-NH2 (
LPLRFamide) revealed two distinct populations of cells. Both were acet
ylcholinesterase positive, but LPLRFamide-immunoreactive cells consist
ently stained more darkly for acetylcholinesterase activity. Tyrosine
hydroxylase immunocytochemistry revealed fibers and terminal-like punc
ta in the ganglion, primarily in areas containing GnRH-immunoreactive
cells. Consistent with the anatomy, in vitro electrophysiological reco
rdings provided evidence for cholinergic and catecholaminergic actions
. In extracellular recordings, acetylcholine had a variable effect on
baseline ganglion cell activity, whereas norepinephrine consistently r
educed activity. Electrical stimulation of the nerve trunks suppressed
ganglion activity, as did impulses from the brain in vivo. During ele
ctrical suppression, acetylcholine consistently increased activity, an
d norepinephrine decreased activity. Muscarinic and, to a lesser exten
t, alpha-adrenergic antagonists both increased activity during the ele
ctrical suppression, suggesting involvement of both systems. Intracell
ular recordings revealed two types of ganglion cells that were disting
uishable pharmacologically and physiologically. Some cells were hyperp
olarized by cholinergic agonists and unaffected by norepinephrine; the
se cells did not depolarize with peripheral nerve trunk stimulation. A
nother group of cells did depolarize with peripheral trunk stimulation
; a representative of this group was depolarized by carbachol and hype
rpolarized by norepinephrine. These and other data suggest that the bo
nnethead nervus terminalis ganglion contains at least two cell populat
ions that respond differently to acetylcholine and norepinephrine. The
bonnethead nervus terminalis ganglion appears to differ fundamentally
from sensory and autonomic ganglia but does share some features with
the neural circuits of forebrain GnRH systems. (C) 1995 Wiley-Liss, In
c.