There are three major methods for buffer exchange of proteins at indus
trial scale: size exclusion chromatography (SEC), tangential flow filt
ration (TFF), and countercurrent dialysis (CCD). In order to determine
the optimal technology for a given process, a study was done to compa
re these technologies on a technological and economic basis. This comp
arison required that new mathematical models be developed which enable
the common features of each unit operation to be directly compared. T
he new concept of a diavolume equivalent for SEC, defined as the inver
se of the fractional loading, was also introduced to aid in this compa
rison. Variables that were examined for each unit operation included r
ange of buffer exchange, dilution of protein solution, yield, buffer r
equirements, total operating time, throughput, plant space, capital, r
aw materials, and labor costs. It was found that TFF and CCD have a gr
eater range of buffer exchange than SEC. TFF also provides the advanta
ge that concentration of the protein can readily be accomplished in th
e same step. For processes of equal batch size and yield, TFF and CCD
also provide a two- to fivefold improvement in each of the remaining v
ariables. The major economic advantage in using TFF and CCD over SEC i
s the decreased plant size required for manufacturing and thus the lon
ger term use of existing facilities. Situations where SEC (or CCD) wou
ld be favored over TFF are when protein denaturation occurs in TFF but
does not occur in SEC. (C) 1995 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.