This study tested different methods of internal fixation of a symphyse
al disruption, in comparison with the mechanics of the intact pelvis.
Unembalmed cadaveric pelves were tested in simulated bilateral stance
in a servohydraulic materials-testing machine. Motion of the superior
and inferior pubic symphysis, and Lit two levels of the posterior sacr
oiliac complex, was measured using high resolution displacement transd
sucers. The fixations tested were (1) double plating (4.5 mm reconstru
ction plates), (2) wire loops around two 6.5 mm, fully threaded cancel
lous screws, and (3) an absorbable suture material (polydioxanone). Ea
ch pelvis was first tested intact, recording displacements in response
to a cyclic axial load up to a maximum of 500 N applied through the p
roximal sacrum. The pubic symphysis was then sectioned and the sacrum
fractured to produce an unstable pelvis (Tile C-type). Recordings were
then repeated, following fixation of the sacral fracture with lag scr
ews and sequential fixation of the symphysis with each of the test met
hods. The results from eight pelves revealed that internally fixed sym
physeal motion was generally greater than intact, regardless of fixati
on method. The superior symphysis was usually compressed while there w
as distraction inferiorly. Wiring resulted in significantly less symph
yseal motion than the other methods (P < 0.02), provided four loops we
re used reducing the separation inferiorly. There was no significant d
ifference in sacral fracture motion between the three methods. The res
ults indicate that in osteoporotic bone, as used in this study, symphy
seal wiring is best able to oppose the tensile loads in the inferior s
ymphysis that are associated with bilateral stance loading. These biom
echanical findings must be interpreted within the broader context of s
urgical management of these complex injuries.