D. Mulcahy et al., ISCHEMIA DURING AMBULATORY MONITORING AS A PROGNOSTIC INDICATOR IN PATIENTS WITH STABLE CORONARY-ARTERY DISEASE, JAMA, the journal of the American Medical Association, 277(4), 1997, pp. 318-324
Objective.-To assess long-term prognostic significance of transient is
chemia in patients with documented coronary artery disease and stable
symptoms and to examine the relation between transient ischemia and th
e site of angiographic disease progression following acute cardiac eve
nts. Design.-Cohort study with a mean+/-SD follow-up of 51.5+/-23.8 mo
nths. Setting.--Ambulatory patients with stable coronary artery diseas
e, assigned to medical therapy. Patients.-A total 221 patients (173 me
n; mean age, 60.8 years) were recruited, Of the 221 patients, 101 (45.
7%) had single-vessel, 86 (38.9%) had 2-vessel, and 34 (15.4%) had 3-v
essel disease. A total of 135 had a positive exercise test for ischemi
a, and mean+/-SD resting left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was
49.8%+/-11.4%. Using conventional criteria, patients were prospective
ly stratified as low risk for continued medical therapy (single-vessel
disease, 2-vessel disease with negative exercise test, or LVEF greate
r than or equal to 40%; n=189 [85.5%]) or high risk for continued medi
cal therapy (multivessel disease with ischemia and/or left ventricular
dysfunction; n=32 [14.5%]). Interventions.-Ambulalory ST-segment moni
toring, treadmill exercise testing, radionuclide ventriculography, and
coronary angiography. Main Outcome Measures.-Demographic, clinical, a
mbulatory monitoring, treadmill exercise, and left ventricular functio
n variables as independent predictors of acute (cardiac death, myocard
ial infarction, or unstable angina) or all (including revascularizatio
n) cardiac events in the overall and the low-risk population. Results.
-None of the clinical or noninvasive measures of ischemia were of prog
nostic significance in the overall or the low-risk group. The only sig
nificant independent predictor of outcome in all patients for all even
ts, including revascularization, was the number of diseased vessels (c
hi(2)=13.5 [df=1]; P<.001). Exclusion of vessel disease resulted in co
nventional risk stratification as the most significant predictor of ou
tcome from all events in all patients (chi(2)=10.3 [df=1]; P=.001). In
the low-risk group, the number of diseased vessels was the only predi
ctor for all events (chi(2)=4.6; P=.03). For acute cardiac events, non
e of the variables tested were of prognostic significance. Based on th
e frequency of events in the low-risk patients, a 2-fold increase in t
he rate of cardiac events in patients with transient ischemia compared
with those without transient ischemia during ambulatory monitoring co
uld be excluded with greater than 85% power and alpha of .05. Of 30 pa
tients suffering acute nonfatal cardiac events during follow-up, angio
graphy was performed in 27, revealing significant progression of coron
ary disease in 24 (88.8%) and the development of new significant lesio
ns al sites remote from previously significant lesions in 20 (74%) cas
es. These new lesions were equally likely to occur in those with or wi
thout transient ischemia at initial assessment. Conclusions.-Acute car
diac events in predominantly low-risk stable angina patients with conf
irmed coronary disease are unpredictable, and those more likely to suf
fer such an event cannot be identified by the detection of ambulatory
ischemia. Acute nonfatal cardiac events result predominantly from the
development of significant new coronary lesions, not initially severe
enough to cause ischemia. Patients categorized as high risk for long-t
erm medical therapy have an increased rate of cardiac events (mainly r
evascularization) when compared with low-risk patients.