PURPOSE: To determine the potential and limitations of MR angiography
in the evaluation of spinal vascular malformations. METHODS: Eleven co
nsecutive patients with spinal vascular malformations proved with spin
al selective arteriography underwent two-dimensional phase-contrast MR
angiography. RESULTS: Abnormal vessels within the spinal canal were i
dentified with MR angiography in 10 patients. In 1 patient with a dura
l arteriovenous fistula no definite vascular abnormality was seen with
MR angiography. Correlation of MR angiography with spinal selective a
rteriography showed that the former allowed identification of the arte
rial feeder in 3 patients with intramedullary arteriovenous malformati
ons and 2 with perimedullary arteriovenous fistula, whereas the source
of intradural draining vein was seen in only 2 of 6 patients with dur
al arteriovenous fistula. CONCLUSION: MR angiography is a promising co
mplementary tool to MR imaging for detection and characterization of s
pinal vascular malformations.