HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE (H2O2) PRODUCTION BY MONOAMINE-OXIDASE IN RAT-TISSUES USING ENDOGENOUS CATECHOLAMINES AS SUBSTRATES - A COMPARISON OF CATALYTIC MONOAMINE-OXIDASE HISTOCHEMISTRY AND RECENTLY PUBLISHED CATECHOL-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY
G. Nakos et R. Gossrau, HYDROGEN-PEROXIDE (H2O2) PRODUCTION BY MONOAMINE-OXIDASE IN RAT-TISSUES USING ENDOGENOUS CATECHOLAMINES AS SUBSTRATES - A COMPARISON OF CATALYTIC MONOAMINE-OXIDASE HISTOCHEMISTRY AND RECENTLY PUBLISHED CATECHOL-O-METHYLTRANSFERASE IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY, Acta histochemica, 97(1), 1995, pp. 121-127
Histochemical studies on hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) production by monoam
ine oxidase (MAOX) using xenobiotic (foreign) catecholamines such as t
ryptamine or tyramine as substrates may not reveal the true H2O2-produ
ction capacity of this enzyme and the potential co-localization and co
operation of MAOX with catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT), the other
catecholamine-degrading enzyme. Therefore, in the present study the ca
techolamine hormones adrenaline (epinephrine) and noradrenaline (norep
inephrine) and the catecholamine neurotransmitter noradrenaline as wel
l as the COMT metabolites metanephrine and normetanephrine, which ace
likely to be the more important MAOX substrates, were used for MAOX vi
sualization in many rat tissues with a cerium-diaminobenzidine-H2O2-Co
method. Adrenaline and noradrenaline were autooxidized by Ce3+ and co
uld not be employed; with metanephrine or normetanephrine as substrate
s MAOX produced considerable amounts of H2O2 in many cells and tissues
. Comparisons with immunohistochemical COMT-data for rats from the lit
erature show that MAOX and COMT are co-localized or not. Therefore, di
fferent from our current knowledge in rats COMT and MAOX either co-ope
rate in catecholamine degradation or they degrade the respective catec
holamines alone.