HOMOGENEITY TESTS BASED UPON GUMBEL DISTRIBUTION AND A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL OF DALRYMPLE TEST

Citation
Hd. Fill et Jr. Stedinger, HOMOGENEITY TESTS BASED UPON GUMBEL DISTRIBUTION AND A CRITICAL-APPRAISAL OF DALRYMPLE TEST, Journal of hydrology, 166(1-2), 1995, pp. 81-105
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Engineering, Civil","Water Resources","Geosciences, Interdisciplinary
Journal title
ISSN journal
00221694
Volume
166
Issue
1-2
Year of publication
1995
Pages
81 - 105
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-1694(1995)166:1-2<81:HTBUGD>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Homogeneity tests are an important component of many regional flood fr equency analysis methods, particularly index flood methods. The index method was first suggested by Dalrymple, who also proposed a homogenei ty test. Dalrymple's test has been widely used in hydrologic practice for more then 30 years. This paper analyzes the relative performance o f Dalrymple's test, a normalized quantile test based upon L-moment par ameter estimation (X-10 test), and a method of moment Cv test (MoM-Cv test). Dalrymple's original test is shown to be in error and a correct ed version is developed. A Monte Carlo study compares the power of the se three tests, after applying correction factors to the test statisti cs to achieve a 5% Type I error. The L-moment X-10 test was always mor e powerful then Dalrymple's test or the MoM-Cv test. Moreover, the X-1 0 test needs much less correction to achieve the specified Type I erro r. An analytical analysis of the power of the test is consistent with the Monte Carlo results. The superior performance of the X-10 test is due to its L-moment estimation procedure, which yields a smaller sampl ing variance and a sampling distribution closer to normality than clas sical product moments. The relationship of the X-10 test with other L- moment based tests proposed by other workers is discussed. The origina l version of Dalrymple's test should not be used.