Rjbj. Gemke et al., COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE - A NATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY, Critical care medicine, 23(2), 1995, pp. 238-245
Objective: Comparative assessment of performance of pediatric intensiv
e care, Design: Open, prospective multicenter study, Setting: All pedi
atric intensive care units (n = 10; six tertiary and four nontertiary)
in the Netherlands, Patients: 1063 consecutive unselected admissions,
less than or equal to 18 yrs old, during a 4-month period, Interventi
ons: None, Measurements and Main Results: Effectiveness was defined as
the ratio of observed to expected (Pediatric Risk of Mortality-score-
derived) mortality, Efficiency was determined by two objective criteri
a: mortality risk of >1%, or administration of at least one intensive
care unit (ICU)-dependent therapy. In the total population, observed a
nd expected mortality rates were similar, Between hospitals, crude mor
tality showed wide variations (mean 7.1%, range 1% to 10%), However, i
n each center, observed and expected mortality rates were similar (mea
n ratio of observed/expected mortality 0.99, range 0.8 to 1.5), In ter
tiary care centers, severity of illness-corrected mortality rates in h
igh-risk patients were less than in a United States reference populati
on, Paradoxically, in low-risk tertiary care patients, the observed mo
rtality rate was higher than expected, The relatively high mortality r
ate in this group is probably the result of the large number of low-ri
sk tertiary care patients suffering from severe, incurable chronic dis
ease, The average number of efficient ICU days was 72%, although large
fluctuations between units were found (range 22% to 95%), suggesting
that in several centers efficiency rates might be improved by a better
selection of high-risk patients requiring ICU-dependent therapies, Co
nclusions: Differences in mortality rates among pediatric ICUs were la
rgely explained by differences in severity of illness, High efficiency
rates combined with adequate effectiveness were found in several cent
ers, indicating that admission and discharge decisions might be improv
ed in less efficient centers.