B. Brismar et al., MEROPENEM VERSUS IMIPENEM-CILASTATIN IN THE TREATMENT OF INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS, Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 35(1), 1995, pp. 139-148
In order to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacy and safe
ty of meropenem with imipenem/cilastatin, 249 patients with intra-abdo
minal infections participated in an open randomised comparative multic
entre trial. Seventy-five men and 57 women (mean age 51 years) were en
rolled in the meropenem group and 67 men and 50 women (mean age 52 yea
rs) in the imipenem/cilastatin group. The patients received either mer
openem, 500 mg q 8h, or imipenem/cilastatin, 500 mg/500 mg q 8h by int
ravenous infusion for up to 17 days (mean 5 days). Ninety-seven of 99
patients (98%) receiving meropenem were clinically cured while 86 of 9
0 patients (96%) in the imipenem/cilastatin group were clinically cure
d. The microbiological response was satisfactory in 89 of 94 evaluable
patients (95%) receiving meropenem and in 78 of 81 evaluable patients
(96%) receiving imipenem/cilastatin. There was no significant differe
nce in clinical and microbiological efficacy between the two treatment
groups. Adverse reactions were noted in 26 patients receiving meropen
em and in 36 patients receiving imipenem/cilastatin. The present study
shows that meropenem is effective and well tolerated in the treatment
of intra-abdominal infections.