Ae. Dickerson et F. Oakley, COMPARING THE ROLES OF COMMUNITY-LIVING PERSONS AND PATIENT POPULATIONS, The American journal of occupational therapy, 49(3), 1995, pp. 221-228
Objectives. This study compares the occupational role profile of a lar
ge sample of community-living persons without disabilities with the pr
ofile of a population of patients with psychosocial or physical disabi
lities and suggests areas of occupational therapy intervention. Method
s. The Role Checklist was used to compare the roles of 1,020 community
-living persons without disabilities with the roles of 292 adults with
physical lit or psychosocial disabilities. Specifically, community-li
ving persons were matched to the entire patient group, a group of pati
ents with psychosocial dysfunction, and a group of patients with physi
cal dysfunction to compare the groups in terms of their past, present,
and future role profiles and the value they assigned to those roles.
Results. There were significant differences in the types of roles iden
tified In general, the patients identified involvement in fewer presen
t roles than the community-living persons. Differences between the two
groups also appeared in the identification of future roles and value
of those roles. Conclusions. Roles appear to be affected by disability
, whether physical or psychosocial in nature. If role participation is
seen as part of the occupational functioning of the person, occupatio
nal therapy needs to address this area.