COMPARING GENUINE AND SIMULATED SUICIDE NOTES - A NEW PERSPECTIVE - COMMENT

Citation
Gm. Diamond et al., COMPARING GENUINE AND SIMULATED SUICIDE NOTES - A NEW PERSPECTIVE - COMMENT, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 63(1), 1995, pp. 46-48
Citations number
9
Categorie Soggetti
Psycology, Clinical
ISSN journal
0022006X
Volume
63
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
46 - 48
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-006X(1995)63:1<46:CGASSN>2.0.ZU;2-Q
Abstract
The recent article by Stephen T. Black (1993) comparing genuine suicid e notes with simulated notes is examined here. This article corrected a sampling error made in the original study by E.S. Shneidman and N. F arberow (1957), but Black's design suffers from theoretical and method ological problems that render it uninterpretable: First, no theoretica l background is elaborated, and no hypotheses are offered. Second, no constructs are operationalized, and no predictions are tested. In the present article, the operational design is critiqued, and then it is s uggested that the study of suicide notes in this fashion should cease.