In economies with indivisible commodities, consumers tend to prefer lo
tteries in commodities. A potential mechanism for satisfying these pre
ferences is unrestricted purchasing and selling of lotteries in decent
ralized markets, as suggested in Prescott and Townsend [Int. Econ. Rev
. 25, 1-20]. However, this paper shows in several examples that such l
ottery equilibria do not always exist for economies with finitely many
consumers. Other conditions are needed. In the examples, equilibrium
and the associated welfare gains are realized if consumptions are boun
ded or if lotteries are based upon a common ''sunspot device'' as defi
ned by Shell [mimeo, 1977] and Cass and Shell [J. Pol. Econ. 91, 193-2
27]. The paper shows that any lottery equilibrium is either a Walrasia
n equilibrium or a sunspot equilibrium, but there are Walrasian and su
nspot equilibria that are not lottery equilibria.