Suture anchors of various designs are gaining acceptance for open and
arthroscopic procedures. The rapid proliferation of these devices chal
lenges those using them to apply objective criteria for device selecti
on. Comparative data on implant security in different settings, modes
of failure, and ultimate failure strengths is lacking. This study was
undertaken to independently develop such data for an objective compari
son of the suture anchors currently available. Using a fresh never-fro
zen porcine femur model, 10 samples of each of the 14 different anchor
s tested were inserted into each of the three different test areas: di
aphyseal cortex (usually 3- to 4-mm thick), metaphyseal cortex (usuall
y 1- to 2-mm thick), and a cancellous bone ''trough''. The suture anch
ors were threaded with 0.018-inch stainless steel wire or, for anchors
requiring a more flexible suture, 0.018-inch stainless steel 1 x 7 wi
re braid. Tensile stress parallel to the axis of insertion was applied
at a rate of 12.5 mm/second by an Instron 1321 (Instron Corp, City, S
tate) until failure. Average failure strength was calculated for each
anchor at each test area. The anchors tested were the Mitek G2, Mitek
G3, Mitek G4 (Mitek Surgical Products, Norwood, MA), Linvatec Revo scr
ew (Linvatec, Largo, FL), Acufex TAG Wedge, Acufex TAG Rod 2 (Acufex M
icrosurgical, Mansfield, MA), Statak models 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, 5.0, and 5.
2 (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN), Arthrex ESP (Arthrex inc, Naples, FL), Arthrot
ek Harpoon, and Arthrotek LactoSorb (Arthrotek, Warsaw, IN). The avera
ge failure strength of each of these anchors in the diaphyseal cortex,
metaphyseal cortex, and cancellous bone is reported. Using Duncan's m
ultiple range test, the Statak 5.0, 5.2, Revo screw, and Mitek G4 show
ed the highest mean failure strengths in cortical bone. The Statak 5.0
, 5.2, Revo screw, and Mitek G2 had the highest mean failure strengths
in cancellous bone. The Revo screw was the most consistent of these a
nchors in all locations showing very little variation in failure stren
gth despite variations in location or bone density. Mode of failure (a
nchor pullout, suture cutout of the anchor, or wire breakage) was gene
rally consistent for each anchor type, although some variations occurr
ed in different test areas. The size of the insertion hole is clinical
ly important and each anchor's performance was evaluated as a function
of its minor diameter or drill hole. All screw anchors were compared
and the larger the screw anchor, the higher the mean failure strengths
in all three test environments. In contrast, larger drill holes for n
on-screw anchors resulted in lower mean failure strengths in cancellou
s bone. Those anchors suitable for a bioabsorbable construct (ESP, Mit
ek G3, LactoSorb, Acufex TAG Rod 2, and Acufex TAG Wedge) were evaluat
ed together. In this group, for diaphyseal cortex, larger drill holes
resulted in higher mean failure strengths. Considering the metallic an
chors in cancellous bone, larger drill holes lead to lower mean pullou
t strengths.