Ge. Brown et al., LOCALIZED DEFECATION BY PIKE - A RESPONSE TO LABELING BY CYPRINID ALARM PHEROMONE, Behavioral ecology and sociobiology, 36(2), 1995, pp. 105-110
Fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) that have never encountered a pr
edatory pike (Esox lucius), are able to detect conspecific alarm phero
mone in a pike's diet if the pike has recently consumed minnows. It re
mains unclear how this minnow alarm pheromone is secreted by pike and
if a pike is able to avoid being labelled as a potential predator by l
ocalizing these cues away from its foraging range. The first experimen
t determined that minnow alarm pheromone is present in pike feces when
pike are fed minnows. Individual fathead minnows exhibited a fright r
esponse to a stimulus of pike feces if the pike had been fed minnows,
but not if the pike had been fed swordtails, which lack alarm pheromon
e. Individual minnows also exhibited a fright reaction to alarm pherom
one in the water (which contained no feces) housing pike which had bee
n fed minnows, suggesting that alarm pheromone is also released in uri
ne, mucous secretions and/or via respiration. The second experiment de
termined that test pike spent a significantly greater proportion of ti
me in the ''home area'' of the test tanks (i.e. where they were fed) b
ut the majority of feces were deposited in the opposite end of the tes
t tank. By localizing their defecation away from the home or foraging
area, pike may be able to counter the effects of being labelled as a p
redator by the alarm pheromone of the prey species.