Greenhouse CO2 enrichment in warm climates is restricted by the need t
o ventilate, leading some growers to intermittent enrichment, where en
richment and ventilation alternate several times an hour. This strateg
y relies on the heat and CO2 capacity of the system, characterized by
a heating time constant of the order of 10 min, during which period ve
ntilation may be suspended. It is shown that, for slowly changing weat
her, the optimal CO2 enrichment is basically not intermittent (bang-ba
ng control), but rather quasi steady state (smoothly varying singular
control). As the disturbance (weather) frequency increases, the quasi
steady-state (QSS) solution becomes less and less optimal. Nevertheles
s, due to the difficulties involved in implementing a truly optimal co
ntrol (the need for accurate weather forecast and high control fluxes)
, the sub-optimal QSS control may be a better choice. We chose to try
a controller which aims to follow the QSS temperature and CO2 setpoint
s at all disturbance frequencies. The performance of this controller f
or high disturbance frequencies is a few per cent lower than the truly
optimal solution, but over the whole season this effect may not be si
gnificant. On the other hand, the controller is likely to be more robu
st. Implementation of the QSS solution requires simulaneous ventilatio
n and enrichment, properly balanced.