Extracellular pH (pH(e)) was determined by needle microelectrodes in 6
7 tumour nodules in 58 patients. The objective was to evaluate the rel
ationship between pH(e), tumour histology and tumour volume. The mean
age of the patients was 62 years, mean depth of the lesions was 2.7 +/
- 0.2 cm, and mean tumour volume was 187 +/- 60 cm(3) Lesions were loc
ated in readily accessible areas such as on the limbs, neck or chest w
all. Tumour histologies included: 48% adenocarcinoma; 34% squamous cel
l carcinoma; 8% soft tissue sarcoma; and 10% malignant melanoma. The m
ean tumour pH(e) for the entire group of tumours was 7.06 +/- O.05 (ra
nge 5.66-7.78). Variation in pH(e) measurements between tumours was gr
eater than the variation in measurements within tumour (F = 7.11, p <
0.01). In adenocarcinomas pH(e) was 6.93 +/- 0.08 (range 5.66-7.78), i
n soft tissue sarcomas 7.01 +/- 0.21 (6.25-7.45), in squamous cell car
cinomas 7.16 +/- 0.08 (6.2-7.6), and in malignant melanomas 7.36 +/- 0
.1 (6.98-7.77). Tumour pH(e) was significantly different between the f
our histological groups (p < 0.001). When adenocarcinoma and soft tiss
ue sarcoma lesions were grouped together, pH(e) was 6.94 +/- 0.08 comp
ared with 7.20 +/- 0.07 in squamous cell carcinomas and malignant mela
nomas lesions (p < 0.01). Tumour pH(e) increased as a function of the
logarithm of tumour volume at 0.07 +/-0.02 pH unit/ln cm(3) (p = 0.006
, r = 0.34). In conclusion, tumour histology and tumour volume were th
e most important factors determining the range of pH(e)'s. These obser
vations correlated with previous findings that adenocarcinoma and soft
tissue sarcoma were more responsive to thermoradiotherapy than squamo
us cell carcinoma and malignant melanoma.