Although nation-states assume territorial, political and cultural boun
dedness, their boundaries are not uniform barriers, but rather are cha
racterized by varying degrees of openness and closure to international
migrants. The manipulation of the permeability of these boundaries co
nstitutes the politics of admission and exclusion. There are two dimen
sions to such a politics: a geographic one, allowing foreign migrants
access to residence and work in the national territory; and a civic on
e, allowing foreign migrants access to citizenship. This paper provide
s a discussion of the complex economic, political and social forces im
pinging on the politics of admission and exclusion and an analysis of
how these forces have been operating in a particular historical and ge
ographical context to determine the admission of international migrant
s into national territory and community. Throughout the postwar period
the prosperous countries of Western Europe have willingly accepted fo
reign migrants as temporary labor, but have been less willing to provi
de them access to the civil and political rights of citizenship, illus
trating how economic self-interest and exclusionary nationalist and ra
cist ideologies are combined in the admission policies of advanced ind
ustrialized countries. There are signs that the integration of nation-
states into regional blocs such as the EC is shifting the politics of
admission and exclusion practised by the dominant member countries to
the supra-national scale.