Jp. Gourret, MODELING THE MITOTIC APPARATUS - FROM THE DISCOVERY OF THE BIPOLAR SPINDLE TO MODERN CONCEPTS, Acta biotheoretica, 43(1-2), 1995, pp. 127-142
This bibliographical review of the modelling of the mitotic apparatus
covers a period of one hundred and twenty years, from the discovery of
the bipolar mitotic spindle up to the present day. Without attempting
to be fully comprehensive, it will describe the evolution of the main
ideas that have left their mark on a century of experimental and theo
retical research. Fol and Butschli's first writings date back to 1873,
at a time when Schleiden and Schwann's cell theory was rapidly gainin
g ground throughout Germany. Both mitosis and chromosomes were to be d
iscovered within the space of thirty years, along with the two key eve
nts in the animal and plant reproductive cycle, namely fecondation and
meiosis. The mitotic pole, a term still in use to this day, was emplo
yed to describe a morphological fact which was noted as early as 1876,
namely that the lines and the dots of the karyokinetic figure, with i
ts spindle and asters, looks remarkably like the lines of force around
a bar magnet. This was to lead to models designed to explain the move
ments of chromosomes which take place when the cell nucleus appears to
cease to exist as an organelle during mitosis. The nature of those me
chanisms and the origin of the forces behind the chromosomes' ordered
movements were central to the debate. Auguste Prenant, in a remarkable
bibliographical synthesis published in 1910, summed up the opposing v
iewpoints of the 'vitalists', on the one hand, who favoured the theory
of contractility or extensility in spindle fibres, and of those who b
elieved in models based on physical phenomena, on the other. The latte
r subdivided into two groups: some, like Butschli, Rhumbler or Leduc,
referred to diffusion, osmosis and superficial tension, whilst the oth
ers, led by Gallardo and Hartog, focused on the laws of electromagneti
sm. Lillie, Kuwada and Darlington followed up this line of research. T
he mid-2Oth century was a major turning point. Most of the modelling m
entioned above was criticized and fell into disuse after disappearing
from research publications and textbooks. This marked the onset of a n
ew era, as electron microscopes made possible the materialization and
detailed study of the macromolecular elements of the fibres, filaments
and microtubules of the cytoskeleton. The successive phases of(a) de
Harven and Bernhard's 1956 discovery of the centriole's ultrastructure
, (b) its identification with the basal body of the cilia and flagella
, confirming the theory set out by Henneguy and von Lenhossek (1898-99
), (c) the universal presence of microtubules in animal, vegetal and e
ukaryotic protist cells, (d) the polymerization-depolymerization induc
ed reversible transformations of the tubulin pool in mitosing cells (I
noue, 1960), (e) ultrastructural comparative studies of the mitotic ap
paratus of eukaryotes illustrating the Pickett-Heaps integrating conce
pt of the MTOC (microtubule-organizing centre), (f) the possibility of
in vitro experiments on mtocs or on microtubules, brings us upon the
present day, which has seen the focus placed on the concept of motor-p
roteins (kinesin, dynein) and on cell cycle models. The latter are bas
ed on a close coincidence between the observable modifications of the
mitotic apparatus and the periodic variations in intracellular concent
rations of calcium or of certain enzymes (cyclins, Cdc2) during the ma
in transitions of the cell cycle. The potential role of biophysics in
the construction of a unified mitosis theory is examined.