F. Buchegger et al., RADIOLABELED CHIMERIC ANTI-CEA MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY COMPARED WITH THE ORIGINAL MOUSE MONOCLONAL-ANTIBODY FOR SURGICALLY TREATED COLORECTAL-CARCINOMA, The Journal of nuclear medicine, 36(3), 1995, pp. 420-429
Biodistribution and tumor uptake of a chimeric human-mouse monoclonal
antibody (MAb) and the original mouse MAb have been comparatively stud
ied. Methods: Eighteen patients with suspected colorectal cancer sched
uled for surgery underwent immunoscintigraphy with I-123-labeled chime
ric anti-CEA MAb. iodine-125 and I-131 trace-labeled chimeric and orig
inal mouse MAb were simultaneously injected for biodistribution studie
s. Results: Similar serum kinetics and a low immunogenicity were obser
ved for both antibodies. Mean binding capacity to CEA measured in PBS
after radiolabeling was identical for both MAbs and it was slightly de
creased when measured in serum 1-4 hr after injection. Radiochromatogr
ams of patients sera showed immune complex formation related to the am
ount of circulating CEA. Postoperative ex vivo radioactivity counting
in tissue samples revealed similar antibody distributions with notably
similar antibody uptakes in tumors. High tumor uptakes (between 0.02
to 0.06% injected dose per g) were observed in 3 of 13 patients operat
ed for primary or metastatic colorectal cancer. Conclusion: In this du
al-label technique, the radioiodinated anti-CEA IgG(4) chimeric MAb an
d the original mouse IgG(1) MAb were shown to have very similar behavi
or in colorectal cancer patients.