This paper compares ethics programmes in clinical education in two med
ical schools in the Netherlands. Ethics education in the University of
Maastricht is case oriented, whereas the emphasis in ethics teaching
in the Catholic University of Nijmegen is focused on the methods of et
hics and moral reasoning. The general objectives, format and evaluatio
n are discussed. Both programmes assume that in clinical decision-maki
ng normative and technical issues are intertwined; if a normative dime
nsion is intrinsic to medical practice itself, students should learn d
uring clinical training how to explicate and evaluate the moral quanda
ries of their profession. The positive characteristics of the Maastric
ht programme (student-centred approach, relevant cases, team-teaching
of ethicist and clinician), if combined with those of the Nijmegen pro
gramme (a coherent theoretical framework and method for case analysis
and interpretation), would create a new, powerful model for clinical e
thics teaching. In a recent report such a model is advocated for all D
utch medical schools.