COMPARISON OF WOMEN WHO DO AND DO NOT HAVE AMNIOCENTESIS OR CHORIONICVILLUS SAMPLING

Citation
J. Halliday et al., COMPARISON OF WOMEN WHO DO AND DO NOT HAVE AMNIOCENTESIS OR CHORIONICVILLUS SAMPLING, Lancet, 345(8951), 1995, pp. 704-709
Citations number
21
Categorie Soggetti
Medicine, General & Internal
Journal title
LancetACNP
ISSN journal
01406736
Volume
345
Issue
8951
Year of publication
1995
Pages
704 - 709
Database
ISI
SICI code
0140-6736(1995)345:8951<704:COWWDA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Even in areas where prenatal diagnostic testing is offered at no cost to women over a certain age, uptake of testing is not complete. We hav e studied the factors that affect uptake in Victoria, Australia. In 19 88-92, 43% of 37-39-year-old women and 29% of those 40 years and over had no diagnostic testing despite their eligibility for a free test. W e compared the characteristics of untested women (n=3074) with those o f tested women (2462 amniocentesis, 1575 chorionic villus sampling) by use of record-linkage between the Victorian birth register and fetal diagnosis data collection. The indication for testing was maternal age alone. Women who had had 3 or more previous births were less likely t han those of lower parity to undergo testing (odds ratio 0.54 [95% Cl 0.46-0.63], p<0.001), whereas those who had had a previous termination of pregnancy were more likely to be tested than those who had not (1. 52 [1.26-1.83], p<0.001). Women born in non-English-speaking countries and women who lived in rural areas were less likely to be tested. Wom en who gave birth in private hospitals were more likely to be tested t han those who gave birth in any public hospital or at home. These data help to distinguish between issues of choice and access to diagnostic testing. Factors that hinder testing of rural women and of those from non-English-speaking backgrounds should be addressed.