2,4-DIAMINO-5-SUBSTITUTED-QUINAZOLINES AS INHIBITORS OF A HUMAN DIHYDROFOLATE-REDUCTASE WITH A SITE-DIRECTED MUTATION AT POSITION-22 AND OFTHE DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASES FROM PNEUMOCYSTIS-CARINII AND TOXOPLASMA-GONDII
A. Rosowsky et al., 2,4-DIAMINO-5-SUBSTITUTED-QUINAZOLINES AS INHIBITORS OF A HUMAN DIHYDROFOLATE-REDUCTASE WITH A SITE-DIRECTED MUTATION AT POSITION-22 AND OFTHE DIHYDROFOLATE REDUCTASES FROM PNEUMOCYSTIS-CARINII AND TOXOPLASMA-GONDII, Journal of medicinal chemistry, 38(5), 1995, pp. 745-752
2,4-Diaminoquinazoline antifolates with a lipophilic side chain at the
5-position, and in one case with a das sic al (p-aminobenzoyl)-L-glut
am ate side chain, were synthesized as potentially selective inhibitor
s of a site-directed mutant of human dihydrofolate reductase (DHFR) co
ntaining phenylalanine instead of leucine at position 22. This mutant
enzyme is approximately 100-fold more resistant than native enzyme to
the classical antifolate methotrexate (MTX), yet shows minimal cross r
esistance to the nonclassical antifolates piritrexim (PTX) and trimetr
exate (TMQ). Although they were much less potent than trimetrexate and
piritrexim, the lipophilic 5-substituted analogues were all found to
bind approximately 10 times better to the mutant DHFR than to the wild
-type enzyme. The potency of the analogue with a classical (p-aminoben
zoyl)-L-glutamate side chain was similarly diminished in comparison wi
th MTX, but the difference in its binding affinity to the two DHFR spe
cies was only 5-fold. Thus, by making subtle structural changes in the
antifolate molecule, it may be possible to attack resistance due to m
utational alterations in the active site of the target enzyme. Also, t
o test the hypothesis that DHFR from Pneumocystis carinii and Toxoplas
ma gondii may have a less sterically restrictive active site than the
enzyme from mammalian cells, inhibition assays using several of the li
pophilic analogues in the series were carried out against the P. carin
ii and T. gondii reductases in comparison with the enzyme from rat liv
er. In contrast to their preferential binding to mutant versus wild-ty
pe human DHFR, binding of these analogues to the P. carinii and T. gon
dii enzymes was weaker than binding to rat enzyme. It thus appears tha
t, if the active site of the DHFR from these parasites is less sterica
lly restrictive than the active site of the mammalian enzyme, this dif
ference cannot be successfully exploited by moving the side chain from
the 6-position to the 5-position.