Hj. Silverman et al., IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PATIENT SELF-DETERMINATION ACT IN A HOSPITAL SETTING - AN INITIAL EVALUATION, Archives of internal medicine, 155(5), 1995, pp. 502-510
Background: The Patient Self-Determination Act aims to enhance patient
awareness of advance directives by requiring health-care institutions
to ask patients whether they have advance directives and to inform pa
tients of their rights to prepare these documents. We investigated the
following: (1) compliance of the hospital staff with implementing thi
s act, (2) the effects of this act on the extent to which patients dis
cuss and prepare advance directives, and (3) variables that might infl
uence patient discussions on advance planning and preparation of advan
ce directives. Methods: We surveyed 219 patients from a university hos
pital that implemented a nurse-dependent advance directive program. We
also conducted a telephone interview with 57% of these patients at le
ast 6 months after hospital discharge. Results: Nurses asked 70% of th
e patients about the existence of an advance directive and of these pa
tients, only 57% remembered the inquiry. Only 57% of the patients rece
ived the brochure on advance directives and of these patients, only 55
% read the brochure. Only 2% of the patients requested to receive addi
tional information on advance directives. Less than one quarter of the
patients had discussions on advance planning while in the hospital an
d of those patients who were contacted within 6 months after hospital
discharge, 39% had discussions on advance planning and 15% prepared an
advance directive. Race was an independent predictor for hospital dis
cussions, and educational level was an independent predictor for discu
ssions and preparation of advance directives after hospital discharge.
Conclusion: To enhance the effectiveness of a nurse-dependent advance
directive program, hospitals may need (1) to strengthen the quality o
f the patient-nurse encounter in which the issue of advance directives
is raised to more effectively promote patient interest, discussions,
and preparation of advance directives and (2) to account for the socia
l diversity of their patient population.