Sm. Biello et N. Mrosovsky, BLOCKING THE PHASE-SHIFTING EFFECT OF NEUROPEPTIDE-Y WITH LIGHT, Proceedings - Royal Society. Biological Sciences, 259(1355), 1995, pp. 179-187
Previous studies have indicated that the neuropeptide Y input from the
intergeniculate leaflet of the lateral geniculate nucleus to the supr
achiasmatic nucleus is the final part of a non-photic phase shifting p
athway to pacemakers in hamsters, or that neuropeptide Y is necessary
for other pathways to be effective. Experiments in which two stimuli a
re presented during the same circadian cycle have shown that phase shi
fts in response to at least two non-photic stimuli are attenuated by a
subsequent light pulse during the subjective day. This study was cond
ucted to investigate the neural site of the blocking effect of light o
n non-photic stimuli. Experiment 1 showed that phase shifts in respons
e to induced wheel-running during the subjective day are greatly atten
uated by a subsequent light pulse. Experiment 2 showed that phase shif
ts in response to injections of neuropeptide Y in the middle of the su
bjective day were also greatly reduced by a subsequent light pulse. Th
ese results provide some insight about the site of the blocking action
of light on non-photic phase shifts. Because there is evidence indica
ting that neuropeptide Y may mediate phase shifts in response to induc
ed activity, and because light was able to block phase shifts produced
by neuropeptide Y, we conclude that, in blocking activity-induced shi
fts, light must act downstream from the release of neuropeptide Y into
the suprachiasmatic nucleus.