As. Brierley et al., BIOCHEMICAL-GENETIC EVIDENCE SUPPORTING THE TAXONOMIC SEPARATION OF LOLIGO-EDULIS AND LOLIGO-CHINENSIS (CEPHALOPODA, TEUTHOIDEA) FROM THE GENUS LOLIGO, Marine Biology, 127(1), 1996, pp. 97-104
Confusion abounds regarding the relative generic status of many member
species of the squid family Loliginidae. A taxonomic reorganisation w
ithin the family has been proposed in which Loligo species from the In
do-Pacific possessing photophores on the ink sac, including Logligo ed
ulis and Loligo chinensis, are removed to the newly created genus Phot
ololigo. This system of classification has not however gained general
acceptance, and some authors have continued to refer to these species
as Loligo. Here biochemical genetic data gathered using allozyme elect
rophoresis are presented supporting the assertion that L. edulis and L
. chinensis should indeed be positioned in a genus distinct from that
characterised by the type species Loligo vulgaris vulgaris. Cluster an
alysis of allele frequency data from 22 putative enzyme-coding loci su
ggests that L. edulis and L. chinensis are as genetically distant from
L. vulgaris vulgaris as are members of the confamilial genera Alloteu
this, Uroteuthis and Sepioteuthis, and as such warrant separate generi
c status. We conclude that the genus Photololigo is valid.