Cartilaginous tumors of the larynx, while rare, will on occasion be en
countered by the otolaryngologist in routine daily practice. True lary
ngeal chondromas are exceedingly rare, and as a consequence, a putativ
e diagnosis of chondroma should be viewed with suspicion. On pathologi
c examination, laryngeal chondromas usually prove to be small lesions
(less than 2 cm in maximum dimension) and may arise in children or adu
lts. Laryngeal chondrosarcomas, by contrast, usually prove to be large
r lesions(exceeding 3 cm in greatest dimension) and are typically foun
d in adults. While high-grade chondrosarcomas are readily identifiable
on light microscopic study, the distinction between a chondroma and a
low-grade chondrosarcoma is often not so clear-cut. Some low-grade ch
ondrosarcomas may show a slight increase in both cellularity and cytol
ogic atypia when compared with chondromas, but the two patterns often
overlap. When faced with a limited biopsy specimen of a laryngeal cart
ilaginous lesion in which neither increased cellularity nor recognizab
le cytologic atypia is found, a diagnosis of ''cartilaginous tumor wit
hout obvious evidence of malignancy-further classification dependent o
n examination of the lesion in its entirety,'' or words to this effect
is recommended.