M. Grasso et al., THE CASE FOR PRIMARY ENDOSCOPIC MANAGEMENT OF UPPER URINARY-TRACT CALCULI .1. A CRITICAL-REVIEW OF 121 EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK-WAVE LITHOTRIPSY FAILURES, Urology, 45(3), 1995, pp. 363-371
Objectives To define those patients with upper urinary tract calculi w
ho are more likely to have an unsuccessful outcome from extracorporeal
shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL). Methods. A critical prospective analys
is of 121 patients, referred to two university centers after ESWL had
been exhausted as a treatment modality for upper urinary tract calculi
, was performed. Patients were subdivided into the following groups: f
ailure to clear fragments, failure to fragment, difficulty in calculus
localization, and failure due to inherent upper urinary tract obstruc
tion. Other important variables include the type of extracorporeal lit
hotriptor used, number of treatment sittings before referral, calculus
location, calculus composition, patient body habitus, and the imaging
leading to and associated with extracorporeal therapy. Results. Large
renal calculi (mean, 22.2 mm) and those within dependent or obstructe
d portions of the collecting system were frequently referred for endos
copic management after failed ESWL. Steinstrasse can be an extremely m
orbid complication from ESWL and in this series was associated with ir
reversible loss of venal function and ureteral stricture disease. Extr
acorporeal lithotripsy of infectious calculi can be associated with se
vere septic complication. inadequate preoperative and intraoperative i
maging and morbid obesity were also associated with failure. Second- a
nd third-generation lithotriptors were represented in greater numbers
than the Dornier HM-3 in this group of ESWL failures. Conclusions. ESW
L remains the treatment of choice for moderately sized, uncomplicated
renal calculi. Large calculi, those within obstructed or dependent por
tions of the collecting system, and those composed of calcium oxalate
monohydrate, frequently fail ESWL. Training in the more technically ch
allenging aspects of endoscopic lithotripsy must be encouraged.