Da. Pickett et Df. Welch, EVALUATION OF THE AUTOMATED BACT-ALERT SYSTEM FOR PEDIATRIC BLOOD CULTURING, American journal of clinical pathology, 103(3), 1995, pp. 320-323
The Organon Teknika BacT/Alert (Organon Teknika, Durham, NC), using th
e Pedi-BacT 20 mt aerobic bottle (BPBCS) was compared to the Wampole I
solator (WI) 1.5 Microbial tube (Wampole Laboratories, Cranbury, NJ),
for detection and recovery of pediatric pathogens. The BPBCS continuou
sly monitors culture bottles for changes in CO2 concentrations, while
WI cultures are examined twice daily for appearance of colonial growth
on agar media. Of 5,175 paired blood cultures, 383 pathogens were rec
overed from 606 positive cultures. There were 272 pathogens recovered
by both systems, 64 from BPBCS only, and 47 from WI only. Overall reco
very rates were 88% for BPBCS and 83% for WI. There was no significant
difference between the two systems in detection or times to positivit
y of staphylococci, Enterobacteriaceae, or pseudomonads. Trends toward
better recovery of streptococci (20 vs. 10) and fastidious microaerop
hiles (3 vs. 0) were found with BPBCS, whereas more slow ly growing pa
thogens (Rochalimaea henselae [1], Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare
[1]) were recovered by WI only, but because of their lower frequency d
id not achieve statistical significance. Detection of Haemophilus infl
uenzae (14.9 hours in WI vs. 45.4 hours in BPBCS) was faster with WI.
False positive plus contaminant cultures were detected in 5.9% BPBCS v
ersus 1.5% WI. BPBCS offers detection of bacteremia at a rate comparab
le to WI with advantages of automation.