Ea. Blair et al., COST-ANALYSIS OF ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN CLEAN HEAD AND NECK-SURGERY, Archives of otolaryngology, head & neck surgery, 121(3), 1995, pp. 269-271
Objective: This study was undertaken to assess the excess cost of hosp
italization accrued to patients who develop postoperative wound infect
ion following neck dissection in which the wound was not exposed to se
cretions from the upper aerodigestive tract. Design: A retrospective c
ohort of patients who underwent ''clean'' neck dissection from 1976 to
1989 were evaluated. Antibiotic administration (yes or no), postopera
tive wound infection (yes or no), and duration and cost of hospitaliza
tion were assessed. Setting: All surgeries were performed in a univers
ity medical center. Patients: All patients underwent neck dissection i
n which the procedure was clean, ie, there was no exposure to secretio
ns from the upper aerodigestive tract. Main Outcome Measures: Patients
were assessed to determine administration of antibiotics (yes or no),
development of postoperative wound infection (yes or no), and duratio
n and cost of hospitalization. Results: Wound infection developed in 1
0 (10%) of 99 patients who did not receive antibiotics. Of 93 patients
who received perioperative antibiotics, three (3.3%) developed wound
infection. This difference was not statistically significant. The type
II (beta) error was greater than 0.2, suggesting that a significant d
ifference may have been missed (false-negative) as a result of the sma
ll number of patients studied. The excess cost accrued to each patient
who developed a postoperative wound infection was in excess of $36 00
0 (1992 dollars). The cost of administration of antibiotic prophylaxis
to 100 patients is less than this amount. Conclusion: The decision to
withhold antibiotic prophylaxis should not be made in an effort to re
duce hospital costs.