A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CLINICAL-TRIAL OF TOPICAL CLOTRIMAZOLE VERSUS MICONAZOLE FOR TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE OF SAUDI-ARABIA
Eb. Larbi et al., A RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, CLINICAL-TRIAL OF TOPICAL CLOTRIMAZOLE VERSUS MICONAZOLE FOR TREATMENT OF CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS IN THE EASTERN PROVINCE OF SAUDI-ARABIA, The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 52(2), 1995, pp. 166-168
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath","Tropical Medicine
The parenteral treatment currently available for cutaneous leishmanias
is (CL) is painful and potentially exposes patients to serious side ef
fects. Thus, effective, topical therapy would be valuable. We assessed
the efficacy of topical 1% clotrimazole and 2% miconazole creams in r
elation to early healing of lesions in CL in a randomized, double-blin
d clinical trial in 54 patients with 151 lesions treated for 30 consec
utive days. Response to treatment was assessed at two weeks and 30 day
s and classified as fully healed, size reduced, no change, and size in
creased or worse. Of 89 lesions treated with clotrimazole, 14 (15.7%)
healed fully, 42 (47.2%) were reduced in size, 20 (22.5%) showed no ch
ange, and 13 (14.6%) got worse. Correspondingly, in the 62 lesions tre
ated with miconazole, none healed fully, 22 (35.5%) were reduced in si
ze, 16 (25.8%) showed no change, and 24 (38.7%) got worse. The differe
nces were statistically significant (P < 0.001). No side effects were
observed. It is concluded that clotrimazole was the more effective of
the two imidazoline compounds and is recommended as initial treatment
for simple lesions.