Aac. Cameron et al., INTERNAL THORACIC ARTERY GRAFTS - 20-YEAR CLINICAL FOLLOW-UP, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 25(1), 1995, pp. 188-192
Objectives. This study compared the long-term clinical results of coro
nary artery bypass surgery in patients with internal thoracic artery g
rafts with those in patients with vein grafts only. Background. Aortoc
oronary artery bypass surgery has been performed for >25 years, primar
ily utilizing the saphenous vein and internal thoracic artery as condu
its. Although the internal thoracic artery has been shown to confer a
clinical advantage, it is not known for how many years this benefit mi
ll continue. Methods. All consecutive patients undergoing initial coro
nary artery bypass surgery between 1970 and 1973 were followed for up
to 20 years, Clinical evaluation included survival, late myocardial in
farction, need for reoperation and recurrence of angina. Patients were
analyzed in three groups: vein grafts only (214 patients); a single i
nternal thoracic artery graft with or without associated vein grafts (
490 patients); and bilateral internal thoracic artery grafts (39 patie
nts). Use of the operating microscope mas also analyzed with regard to
effect on survival. Results. The internal thoracic artery graft and u
se of the operating microscope were independent predictors of mortalit
y and reduced the risk of dying by a factor of 0.68 and 0.76, respecti
vely. An internal thoracic artery graft resulted in a mean survival of
4.4 years longer than that with vein grafts alone, The internal thora
cic artery graft compared with vein grafts was associated with fewer r
eoperations (p < 0.001), fewer late myocardial infarctions, lower asso
ciated mortality rates (p < 0.04) and less early recurrence of angina
(p = 0.03). Conclusions. The internal thoracic artery graft and use of
the operating microscope confer a superior clinical advantage over th
e saphenous vein graft throughout a 20-year follow-up period. The adva
ntage of an internal thoracic artery graft does not decrease with time
, suggesting that the choice of conduit at the initial operation is mo
re important clinically than progression of coronary artery disease.