Jj. Brejda et al., INDIANGRASS AND CAUCASIAN BLUESTEM RESPONSES TO DIFFERENT NITROGEN-SOURCES AND RATES IN THE OZARKS, Journal of range management, 48(2), 1995, pp. 172-180
Alternatives to cool-season grasses are needed for summer forage produ
ction on droughty, infertile soils in the Ozarks. The objective of thi
s research was to compare nitrogen (N) sources and application rates f
or improving forage production, crude protein concentration, and appar
ent fertilizer N recovery by 'Rumsey' indiangrass [Sorghastrum nutans
(L.) Nash] and caucasian bluestem [Bothriochloa caucasia (Trin.) C.E.
Hubbard]. Pure stands of each species were treated with urea, NH4NO3,
or (NH4)(2)SO4 at 0, 56, 112, and 168 kg N ha(-1) from 1985-1987. In 1
988 the (NH4)(2)SO4 treatment was discontinued and in 1990 the N rates
were increased to 0, 78, 157, and 235 kg N ha(-1). Forage yields, cru
de protein concentrations or both were greater with NH4NO3 compared to
urea in 3 out of 6 years for indiangrass and 4 out of 6 years for cau
casian bluestem. Indiangrass forage yields increased with increasing N
rates up to 168 kg N ha(-1). Caucasian bluestem forage yields peaked
at 101 kg N ha(-1) in 1985, 132 kg N ha(-1) in 1986, 122 kg N ha(-1) i
n 1987, 129 kg N ha(-1) in 1989, and 161 kg N ha(-1) in 1990. Crude pr
otein concentrations of both species increased linearly with N rates i
n most years. At the lowest N rate (56 kg N ha(-1)) caucasian bluestem
was more efficient than indiangrass in apparent fertilizer N recovery
, but at greater N rates the 2 species were similar in fertilizer N re
covery. Forage yield and crude protein concentration of both species r
esponded similarly to (NH4)(2)SO4 and NH4NO3.