A SURVEY OF CATTLE PRODUCERS IN THE BOOPHILUS-MICROPLUS ENDEMIC AREA OF QUEENSLAND TO DETERMINE ATTITUDES TO THE CONTROL OF AND VACCINATIONAGAINST TICK FEVER
Re. Bock et al., A SURVEY OF CATTLE PRODUCERS IN THE BOOPHILUS-MICROPLUS ENDEMIC AREA OF QUEENSLAND TO DETERMINE ATTITUDES TO THE CONTROL OF AND VACCINATIONAGAINST TICK FEVER, Australian Veterinary Journal, 72(3), 1995, pp. 88-92
A survey by mail was used to determine the views of beef producers in
the Boophilus microplus endemic area of Queensland on the control of a
nd vaccination against tick fever, Data from 448 questionnaires were a
nalysed, representing 2.7% of beef producers in the survey area. Produ
cers considered buffalo fly (Haematobia irritans exigua) infestation a
s the most important problem whereas tick fever ranked sixth overall,
Private veterinarians were regarded as the most important source of in
formation on vaccines for cattle followed by a weekly rural newspaper.
From the survey we estimate that about 33% of producers used the tick
fever vaccine produced by the Tick Fever Research Centre of Queenslan
d Department of Primary Industries but there were significant (P < 0.0
5) variations between regions and herds, Large herds (greater than or
equal to 400 head) in south-east Queensland were the most likely to be
vaccinated against tick: fever, Of the producers who did not use the
vaccine, over 70% replied that there was no need to vaccinate because
of the low risk of the disease in their herds. In 52% of unvaccinated
herds the treatment of animals with acaricide was considered the most
important means of tick fever control and 61% of these herds comprised
Bos indicus x Bos taurus or Bos indicus cattle.