TESTIS BIOPSY IMAGE-ANALYSIS EFFECTIVELY QUANTIFIES SPERMATOGENIC CELL-TYPES
Citation
Ed. Kim et al., TESTIS BIOPSY IMAGE-ANALYSIS EFFECTIVELY QUANTIFIES SPERMATOGENIC CELL-TYPES, The Journal of urology, 157(1), 1997, pp. 147-150
Categorie Soggetti
Urology & Nephrology
SICI code
0022-5347(1997)157:1<147:TBIEQS>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Purpose: Evaluation of the testis biopsy specimen in male infertility
has been hampered by the qualitative rather than quantitative nature o
f routine histological techniques and interpretation. Although useful,
now cytometry has demonstrated significant limitations due to its ina
bility to differentiate among haploid cell types, spermatozoa and sper
matids. Thus, deoxyribonucleic acid image analysis was performed on te
stis biopsy specimens to combine the advantages of quantitative ploidy
and morphological characteristics to develop a more effective quantit
ative system. Materials and Methods: Image analysis using a specifical
ly designed filter was performed on Feulgen stained 5 mu m. sections o
f paraffin embedded testicular tissue. The archival testicular tissue
had been obtained using standard biopsy techniques from patients with
azoospermia and normal spermatogenesis on routine hematoxylin and eosi
n processed tissue. Results: The overall findings (mean plus or minus
standard deviation) in 20 biopsies from 18 men are haploid 54.2 +/- 5.
6, diploid 31.2 +/- 5.2 and tetraploid 15.0 +/- 4.6%. Spermatozoa and
spermatids contributed 23.2 +/- 5.7 and 30.9 +/- 7.6% to the total cel
l content, respectively. A mean of 2,462 +/- 254 cells were counted pe
r case. Conclusions: We used image analysis to evaluate testicular bio
psies. This technique can quantitatively determine the percentages of
various cell types within the seminiferous tubules. Furthermore, it ca
n differentiate between spermatozoa and spermatids based on morphologi
cal characteristics. This technique, which combines ploidy and cell mo
rphology characteristics, represents a significant advancement in the
interpretation of the testicular biopsy, and has implications for rede
fining the presently used system of qualitative interpretative assessm
ent.