Ml. Reuss et Hr. Gordon, OBSTETRICAL JUDGMENTS OF VIABILITY AND PERINATAL SURVIVAL OF EXTREMELY LOW-BIRTH-WEIGHT INFANTS, American journal of public health, 85(3), 1995, pp. 362-366
Objectives. The purpose of the study was to determine whether the obst
etrical judgment of viability makes a difference to fetal and neonatal
survival of extremely low birthweight infants (500-749 g). Methods. W
e assessed the effect of the antenatal judgment of viability in a grou
p of 66 infants born weighing from 500 to 749 g. These infants were al
ive at maternal hospital admission and were subsequently live-born or
stillborn between January 1, 1984, and December 31, 1985. We related t
he antepartum assessment of viability and other factors recorded in th
e medical record to fetal survival and to postneonatal survival to hos
pital discharge. Results. The obstetrical judgment of viability was st
rongly associated with outcome. After birthweight and gestational age
were controlled, fetuses considered viable were 18 times more likely t
o survive (95% confidence interval = 2, 175) than those considered non
viable. Conclusions. The effects of obstetrical practices on perinatal
mortality must be taken into consideration in estimating the survival
potential of very small fetuses and in evaluating the relationship be
tween survival and disability.