MANAGEMENT OF ANESTHETIC COMPLICATIONS AND EMERGENCIES IN THE OBSTETRIC PATIENT

Citation
Pf. Norman et Jh. Eichhorn, MANAGEMENT OF ANESTHETIC COMPLICATIONS AND EMERGENCIES IN THE OBSTETRIC PATIENT, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America, 22(1), 1995, pp. 1-12
Citations number
35
Categorie Soggetti
Obsetric & Gynecology
ISSN journal
08898545
Volume
22
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1 - 12
Database
ISI
SICI code
0889-8545(1995)22:1<1:MOACAE>2.0.ZU;2-2
Abstract
No other area in medicine requires closer communication and mutual res pect than the obstetric emergency. Not only are there two patients inv olved, but also from both physiologic and medicolegal aspects, time is a critical factor. Selection of the appropriate anesthesia for emerge nt or urgent versus elective abdominal delivery can produce confusion and conflict. Should the choice always be general, or could we conside r a regional anesthetic technique?(1,20) If a rational choice is to be made, the indication(s) for the emergent or urgent cesarean delivery must be clearly stated to the anesthesiologist. These could be materna l, fetal, or both, recognizing that these considerations often are int erdependent. Maternal indications for immediate abdominal delivery (su rgery within 10 minutes) include but are not limited to (1) acute mate rnal hemorrhage with hemodynamic instability, (2) emergency delivery t o facilitate maternal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and (3) surgery t o provide immediate access for the repair of abdominal or pelvic struc tures after blunt or penetrating abdominal trauma.(3,21) Maternal situ ations that permit a more deliberate approach include dysfunctional ac tive labor with failure of descent or dilatation, or both, and a worse ning maternal condition such as severe preeclampsia with or without fe tal decompensation. The diagnosis of ''fetal distress'' is often the b asis of the call for a ''stat'' or emergent cesarean section. In 1992, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists delivered an opinion that ''the term fetal distress is imprecise, nonspecific and h as little positive predictive value.''(1) They urged that the severity of the alterations in the fetal heart rate and fetal status should be considered when choosing rapid sequence general endotracheal versus r egional anesthesia. In actual practice, the proper use of the term fet al distress for immediate cesarean delivery denotes the situation wher e fetal demise is imminent if delivery is postponed. Fetal conditions that require immediate (less than 5-10 minutes) intervention include a prolapsed umbilical cord, prolonged bradycardia, and persistent sever e or late decelerations with slow return to baseline accompanied by mi nimal or abscent beat-to-beat variability. A second group of less life -threatening fetal indications could allow time for a choice of genera l or regional anesthesia depending on maternal desires, body habitus, and the preference or skill of the anesthesiologist or provider (Table 1). In the emergency situation, the obstetrician must clearly communi cate the maternal and fetal condition and the obstetrician's concerns for immediate or urgent delivery in order that the anesthesia team can formulate a rational choice of anesthesia.