This article hypothesizes that the 'Nordic' model of society is primar
ily of Swedish origin, with the other Nordic countries as its first ti
er of followers. The idea of Nordic 'progressivity' has been a useful
instrument in individual Nordic foreign policies- primarily as a 'bast
ion' in official rhetoric. Postwar examples of such usefulness are off
ered from three settings: the Nordic countries as a group in multilate
ral diplomacy, individual Nordic countries in multilateral diplomacy,
and Nordic countries bilaterally in dealings with a great power. Where
as the Nordic bastion could still serve as a useful foreign policy ins
trument, it has actually been discreetly abandoned from 1991, as part
of a deliberate policy on the part of Sweden. The symbol of stable inn
ovation in Northern Europe is gone. The main reason for this abandonme
nt lies in perceived Swedish national interests: how Sweden has chosen
to adapt to the European Union. Domestic Swedish party polemics may a
lso have played a (secondary) role. This abandonment has generally adv
erse implications for the foreign policies of the other Nordic countri
es, depending on which all-European scenario prevails. Prospects for a
future revival of the Nordic bastion do not seem bright.