Explanations of the evolution of canine tooth size sexual dimorphism i
n primates implicitly assume that male canine size is the primary targ
et of natural or sexual selection, even though there is substantial un
explained variation in female canine size. Here we demonstrate that th
e canines of both males and females are relatively larger in species w
here agonistic interactions are more likely to escalate. Hence, the ca
nine teeth of both sexes are influenced by selection for the developme
nt of weaponry, though the nature of the selection (natural or sexual)
favoring development of the canines as weapons depends on the objects
of competition (mates vs. food, for example). However, we also sugges
t that where the outcome of fights is typically determined between coa
litions of individuals, selection for weaponry is reduced, even though
agonistic competition can be very intense. Coalitionary aggression be
tween males occurs in only a handful of anthropoid primates, but it is
common among female anthropoids, and helps explain, in part, the extr
eme sexual dimorphism in the canine teeth of a number of catarrhine sp
ecies. This is the first demonstration that cooperation among animals
may affect their morphology. The lack of sexual dimorphism in canine s
ize among prosimian primates is also consistent with the model. This a
nalysis demonstrates that a better understanding of the interspecific
variation in sexual dimorphism among primates is gained by considering
behavioral variation in both sexes.