Cjw. Vanginkel et Nn. Sabapathy, ALLERGIC CONTACT-DERMATITIS FROM THE NEWLY INTRODUCED FUNGICIDE FLUAZINAM, Contact dermatitis, 32(3), 1995, pp. 160-162
In spring 1992, several farmers in the western part of The Netherlands
developed dermatitis on their hands, forearms and face. In some, the
legs, trunk and genitals were also affected. Complaints ranged from a
mildly itchy, papular rash to a painful, weeping and blistering dermat
itis. Medical aid was needed by 5/9 of them. Some of the farmers grew
seed potatoes, the others cultivated lilies. All of them had in common
that their complaints emerged after repeated application of a new fun
gicide over several weeks. The fungicide was Shirlan(R), with fluazina
m as its active ingredient. 9 farmers were patch tested with a concent
ration range of the whole formulation tag.) and of the active ingredie
nt (pet.). In 7 of 9 farmers, positive patch tests were scored with bo
th the whole formulation (down to 0.01% aq.) and fluazinam itself (dow
n to 0.1% pet.). Patch tests in consecutive control patients (n=10) we
re all negative. As it was impossible to substitute fluazinam as the a
ctive ingredient, farmers are now supplied with detailed information a
s to how to avoid skin contact as much as feasible.