Juvenile Anolis aeneus lizards were released into patches of microhabi
tat in the field, and their social interactions and space use recorded
throughout the settlement period. Two hypotheses about the role of so
cial interactions in space acquisition were tested: (1) settlers win s
pace by winning contests and (2) settlers win space by persistence. Re
sults supported the second hypothesis. Juveniles did not acquire the a
reas in which they won interactions with opponents, and in the vast ma
jority of dyads, both the winner and the loser subsequently avoided th
e location of their first encounter with one another. A second set of
analyses focused on 'space transfers', in which one settler gained pos
session of space that had been used by its opponent before they began
to interact with one another. Subordinates were as successful as domin
ants at taking space from their opponent, and space transfers by domin
ants and subordinates were virtually identical with respect to estimat
es of the costs and benefits of space acquisition. Dominants acquired
space by repeatedly chasing subordinates, and the amount of space that
transferred from subordinate to dominant was positively related to th
e rate at which the dominant attacked the subordinate. Conversely, sub
ordinates took space by persisting in the face of repeated attacks by
dominants, and the amount of space taken by a subordinate was inversel
y related to the rate at which the subordinate was attacked by the dom
inant. Overall, dyads with space transfers interacted at higher rates
for a longer period of time than dyads without transfers, and dyads wi
th transfers were more likely to end up with overlapping activity area
s than were dyads that resolved their disputes without taking space fr
om one another. Two factors had independent effects on the probability
that a dyad would engage in a transfer: (1) spatial overlap when the
pair first encountered one another and (2) contender pressure in the p
atch of territorial habitat.