Objective: To conduct a feasibility study on stress management for pat
ients with heart disease; more specifically, to test the availability
of patients, determine dropout rates, and investigate the sensitivity
to change of a large number of psychologic and biologic stress indexes
. Design: Random assignment, two-group clinical trial. Setting: Pacifi
c Northwest university-affiliated teaching hospital. Patients: Forty-f
ive patients with heart disease (mean age 56 years), who either had a
myocardial infarction or coronary bypass surgery. Outcome Measures: Ho
stility, subjective distress, resting electrocardiogram, resting blood
pressure and blood pressure reactivity to a psychologic stressor, and
blood lipid, cortisol, and catecholamine levels. Intervention: Patien
ts were randomly assigned to either (1) exercise rehabilitation (ER) a
nd an 8-week stress management (SM) program (ER + SM) or (2) ER only.
Although the recruitment rate was satisfactory, 67% of patients assign
ed to the control condition and 40% of the SM subjects were not availa
ble for posttesting. Results: Computed effect sizes indicated that blo
od pressure reactivity to a psychologic challenge was reduced after tr
eatment in the ER + SM group but not in ER group. The ER + SM group sh
owed improvement in perceived health status and had clinically meaning
ful reductions in triglyceride levels, whereas the ER group did not. T
he ER group had a reduction in high-density lipoproteins, whereas the
high-density lipoprotein levels of the ER + SM group did not change. C
onclusions: Patients randomly assigned to a control condition may be l
ess willing to participate in time-consuming and invasive posttests th
an treated patients. Reducing the invasiveness of measurement may incr
ease cost-effectiveness and reduce the dropout rate under controlled c
onditions. Blood pressure reactivity to a psychologic stress test and
changes in serum lipid levels may be sensitive and cost-effective meas
ures to include in future studies of cardiac rehabilitation.