Ninety painful prosthetic hips from 88 consecutive patients underwent
fine needle aspiration and the results compared with clinical progress
, operative findings and culture. Fourteen of the 15 cases proven to b
e infected at operation were correctly identified by fine-needle aspir
ation. The one hip with a false negative aspirate had an arthrogram wh
ich showed a cavity suggesting infection. There were three false posit
ive aspirates, One grew a different organism at surgery from the origi
nal aspirate. The other two had no growth on surgical culture. Both ha
d had pre-operative antibiotics. Eleven cultures of doubtful significa
nce were repeated or regarded as negative and the patients carefully f
ollowed-up. One repeat culture confirmed infection emphasizing the imp
ortance of repeating doubtful aspirates. The sensitivity of aspiration
is 93%, specificity is 96%. The accuracy is 95% confirming that aspir
ation is a simple and reliable method of diagnosing infection in hip p
rostheses.