Nj. Wang et Pj. Riordan, RECALL INTERVALS, DENTAL HYGIENISTS AND QUALITY IN CHILD DENTAL-CARE, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 23(1), 1995, pp. 8-14
Citations number
32
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
Decline in dental disease and the need to provide dental care efficien
tly suggest changes in clinical and administrative routines in public
dental care provision for children. A field project in Norway demonstr
ated productivity gains after the introduction of individualized recal
l intervals and using dental hygienists to conduct recall examinations
. The purpose of the present study was to assess changes in the qualit
y of dental health outcome and changes in the quality of the process o
f dental care provision. Recall intervals were increased from a target
of 12 months to 16 and 18 months in two districts. Dental hygienists
undertook all recall examinations and referred to dentists those patie
nts who required operative care. Bitewing radiographs were inspected f
or all 18-yr-olds who were examined in 1989, 1990 and 1991 (n=956) and
for those who were examined before the changes were implemented in 19
87 (n=300). For each child, approximal caries on 24 surfaces was score
d according to a 4-point severity scale. Clinical records were examine
d to determine what treatment had been provided. For each year after t
he changes were implemented, the quality of health outcome was assesse
d by comparing the radiographic caries prevalence and the number of so
und surfaces with 1987 data. Quality in the process of care provision
was indicated by the treatment decisions for approximal caries and by
the proportion of uninterpretable surfaces on radiographs for each stu
dy year. The mean number of sound surfaces increased over time. A decl
ining proportion of sound surfaces was restored over the study period,
and almost all caries lesions extending deep into dentine were restor
ed. Radiographic quality improved during the project period. The overa
ll finding was that the changes to clinical and administrative routine
s were not associated with major changes in the quality of care provid
ed in the short run.