Y. Songpaisan et al., EFFECTS OF GLASS-IONOMER CEMENT, RESIN-BASED PIT AND FISSURE SEALANT AND HF APPLICATIONS ON OCCLUSAL CARIES IN A DEVELOPING-COUNTRY FIELD TRIAL, Community dentistry and oral epidemiology, 23(1), 1995, pp. 25-29
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Dentistry,Oral Surgery & Medicine","Public, Environmental & Occupation Heath
The aim of this community-oriented study was to evaluate different met
hods to prevent fissure caries. The following products and measures we
re tested: 1) glass ionomer cement (GIG) applied by dentist; 2) same m
aterial applied by short term (3 days) trained personnel (teachers); 3
) application of a 0.5% HF solution three times; 4) an established aut
opolymerized resin based sealant (Delton). The study was performed in
Bangkok, Thailand, a city in a developing country experiencing increas
ing caries prevalence. Children with at least three sound permanent mo
lars from two age groups, 7-8 and 12-13-yr-olds respectively were chos
en from very low to medium socioeconomic level families. 1264 children
were systematically assigned to experiment or control groups based on
school and DMFT. For the younger age group, the 2 yr mean DFS occlusa
l increment in the Control group was 0.66 surfaces. Significantly lowe
r increments were observed in the GIC experimental group: 0.17 surface
s applied by the teachers and 0.32 applied by dentist, corresponding t
o 74% and 52% reductions, respectively. The mean increment in the HF g
roup was 0.44 surfaces, a 33% reduction in relation to the Control gro
up. For the 12-13-yr-olds, the mean occlusal surface DF increment was
0.70 surfaces in the Control group. Almost no occlusal increment was f
ound in the Delton group, 0.05 DFS, a 93% reduction. In the GIC Dentis
t group, the DFS increment was 0.48 and in the Teacher group 0.56, cor
responding to 31% and 20% reduction, respectively. A slight and nonsig
nificant increase of caries in relation to the Control group was obser
ved in the HF group. Retention of Delton sealant was high, 92% after 6
months, retention of the GIC sealants was low. At the 6-months checku
p, only 2-8% of these sealants were still present and also after reapp
lication, a majority was lost.