Rj. Gagnon et al., PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF INSTRUMENTS USE D TO MEASURE KNOWLEDGE, PERCEIVED SKILLS, AND ATTITUDES OF FAMILY PHYSICIANS, Canadian family physician, 41, 1995, pp. 402-410
OBJECTIVE To examine the validity and the reliability of three measure
ment instruments used to evaluate mental health training offered to re
sidents in family medicine. DESIGN Development and submission of three
French-language instruments measuring knowledge, perceived skills, an
d attitudes of family physicians and residents. SETTING Weekly psychot
herapy workshop. PARTICIPANTS A group of 90 family medicine residents
and practising doctors were recruited by the authors and by teaching f
acilities. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Reliability index KR20 and an evaluati
on of error in the instruments were used. RESULTS The results satisfac
tory in terms of the measurement of perceived skills (KR20 = 0,86) and
the measurement of attitudes (KR20 = 0,96); the measurement of knowle
dge (KR20 = 0,70) was clearly unsatisfactory and the instrument will r
equire upgrading. The measurement of perceived skills was the only one
to reveal a distinction between the groups; practising doctors and th
ose interested in psychotherapy believed their skills to be superior t
o those of residents in training (P = 0,005). CONCLUSION Instruments m
easuring attitudes and perceived skills have excellent psychometric po
tential; however, it remains to be determined whether the measurement
of perceived skills is valid and whether these instruments are useful
for monitoring family medicine residents during their training or for
assessing the impact of mental health training programs.