An explanation of the loss-aversion function of prospect theory that r
elates the theory to a distinction between positive-based and negative
-based incentive value was investigated, We predicted that betting dec
isions would show loss aversion to the extent that they involved neces
sary goals-goals that were more likely to be negatively based (associa
ted with a threat of negative alternatives). Therefore, conditions tha
t increased perceived goal necessity should have increased the magnitu
de of the loss-aversion effect. The results from 194 subjects in two s
tudies supported this prediction. Factors related to perceived goal ne
cessity (e.g., telic dominance, imagined proportion of financial asset
s to be gambled, proportion of assets in a necessities account, actual
proportion of income spent on necessities) were related to reluctance
to take hypothetical bets. Relationships seemed to be contingent on b
et characteristics (amount and win-loss ratio), A third study suggeste
d that these results reflected loss aversion rather than risk aversion
.