N. Rea et Gg. Ganf, WATER DEPTH CHANGES AND BIOMASS ALLOCATION IN 2 CONTRASTING MACROPHYTES, Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 45(8), 1994, pp. 1459-1468
The response of B. arthrophylla and T. procerum in pot experiments to
depth and depth changes provided insight into how plants survive fluct
uating water levels. At 0 cm depth, most biomass was placed below grou
nd, which can be interpreted as the placement of resource-acquiring ti
ssues (roots, rhizomes) in resource (nutrients, space) -supplying envi
ronments. At 50 and 100 cm, the placement of biomass into shoots recog
nized the need for a higher supply of above-ground resources (light, i
norganic carbon, oxygen). However, the responses of the two species to
flooding or exposure differed. Rhizome storage supported an increase
in the number and height of B. arthrophylla stems when flooded by 50 c
m but this species was unable to counteract submergence to 100 cm with
out the critical toss of root mass. The slow turnover rate of the cuti
cularized B. arthrophylla stems indicates that biomass needs to be all
ocated above water as well as above ground. Other responses indicated
that this species may be better suited to seasonally fluctuating rathe
r than permanent water levels. T. procerum dealt with water level chan
ges via morphological plasticity. Along with the rapid growth and turn
over of the spongy leaves, its shoot and total mass were maintained pr
imarily from resources in the tubers.