GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO CRANIAL CAPACITY IN BLACK-AND-WHITE ADOLESCENTS

Citation
Jp. Rushton et Rt. Osborne, GENETIC AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO CRANIAL CAPACITY IN BLACK-AND-WHITE ADOLESCENTS, Intelligence, 20(1), 1995, pp. 1-13
Citations number
38
Categorie Soggetti
Psychology
Journal title
ISSN journal
01602896
Volume
20
Issue
1
Year of publication
1995
Pages
1 - 13
Database
ISI
SICI code
0160-2896(1995)20:1<1:GAECTC>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
Data from 236 pairs of twins (472 individuals) aged 13 to 17 years wer e used to examine genetic and environmental factors influencing crania l size, an indirect estimate of brain volume. Measures were taken of z ygosity, head length, head breadth, age, sex, race, height, and weight for 187 males and 285 females, 222 Whites and 250 Blacks, Cranial siz e was estimated from head length and head breadth using standard equat ions. Group differences were found. Cranial capacity increased over ag e 13 to 17 from 1,233 cm(3) to 1,279 cm(3). After adjusting for the ef fects of age and body size, boys averaged 1,290 cm(3) and girls 1,229 cm(3), Whites averaged 1,269 cm(3) and Blacks 1,251 cm(3). Intraclass correlations were calculated and models fitted of proportionate geneti c and environmental contributions to variance. Depending on particular corrections for body size, heritabilities for the sample as a whole r anged from 38% to 51% with 6% to 20% due to common environment and fro m 42% to 52% due to unique (nonshared) environmental factors, includin g error variance. The proportionate contributions did not vary systema tically by sex and the seemingly higher range of heritabilities estima ted for Whites than for Blacks (47% to 56% against 12% to 31%) and the lower range of common environment effects for Whites than for Blacks (28% to 32% against 42% to 46%) did not differ significantly In conclu sion, it is indicated that genetic factors are required to account for the phenotypic variance in cranial capacity and that further research is required on whether environmental factors exert more influence in Black populations than in White populations.