KINETICS OF HOMOGENEOUS NUCLEATION IN THE FREEZING OF LARGE WATER CLUSTERS

Citation
Jf. Huang et Ls. Bartell, KINETICS OF HOMOGENEOUS NUCLEATION IN THE FREEZING OF LARGE WATER CLUSTERS, Journal of physical chemistry, 99(12), 1995, pp. 3924-3931
Citations number
74
Categorie Soggetti
Chemistry Physical
ISSN journal
00223654
Volume
99
Issue
12
Year of publication
1995
Pages
3924 - 3931
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3654(1995)99:12<3924:KOHNIT>2.0.ZU;2-M
Abstract
Water clusters of 4000-6000 molecules were produced by condensation of vapor in supersonic flow and cooled by evaporation until they froze a t about 200 K. Rates of nucleation up to 10(30) m(-3) s(-1) were deter mined by electron diffraction measurements at microsecond intervals. A lthough nucleation rates were 20 orders of magnitude higher than in pr evious investigations of the freezing of water, this enormous disparit y was accounted for naturally by the classical theory of nucleation. T he free energy sigma(sl) of the solid-liquid interface implied by the results increases with temperature as T-n, with n approximately 0.3-0. 4, the same range of values as found for mercury in the only well-esta blished trend known to the present investigators. The interfacial free energy of 21.6 mJ/m(2) derived for clusters of water is virtually the same as that obtained for small water droplets by several workers but is substantially lower than the value inferred from the interfacial t ension in the bulk system at 0 degrees C. This difference is a consequ ence of the different forms of ice encountered in the different experi ments. Bulk water freezes to the thermodynamically stable hexagonal ic e (Ih), whereas highly supercooled-water freezes to the kinetically fa vored cubic ice (Ic), a reaction product offering a lower free energy barrier. Anomalously, the ratio of sigma(sl) to the heat of fusion per unit area derived for supercooled water is only about two-thirds that suggested originally for water by Turnbull but since found to apply q uite well to other nonmetallic substances. Two variants of the classic al theory of homogeneous nucleation are compared, and some deficiencie s of the theory are discussed.